• From
    • To


14 results for "mailbag"

Page of 1
  1. Respect, top-25 rankings have no bearing on Bracketology

    Charlie Creme

    Why do fans always pull out the "no respect" card? Why can't they understand that the top-25 polls have no bearing on Bracketology? Why should Gail Goestenkors and Texas make the NCAA field? And just why might Charlie Creme's TiVo be offended?

    Story | Conversation | February 28, 2008
  2. Remember, head-to-head record is one of many factors

    Charlie Creme

    It might be Valentine's Day. But Wyoming fans critical of the Cowgirls' No. 9 seed in Monday's projection weren't giving any love to our bracketologist.

    Story | Conversation | February 14, 2008
  3. Maryland or Rutgers? The answer isn't set in stone

    Charlie Creme

    Last week, and perhaps for the rest of the regular season, the biggest question is whether Maryland or Rutgers deserves the fourth and final No. 1 seed.

    Story | Conversation | February 02, 2008
  4. Take a step back, Big East fans

    Charlie Creme

    Big East fans weren't satisfied with UConn and Rutgers getting No. 1 seeds in Charlie Creme's projection. But our bracketologist explains why more teams from the conference weren't included in the field.

    Story | Conversation | December 13, 2007
  5. Lots and lots ... and lots of Lobos fans

    Charlie Creme

    Fans of New Mexico want in. Even if it's at the expense of the Lobos' neighbors in the Lonestar State.

    Story | Conversation | March 02, 2007
  6. A closer look at mediocrity

    Charlie Creme

    Big East, SEC and MWC fans wonder why their teams didn't get a higher seed -- or in some cases, make our Bracketology at all.

    Story | Conversation | February 23, 2007
  7. Where the S-curve and geography meet

    Charlie Creme

    Our bracketologist explains how No. 2 overall seed North Carolina ended up in the Dayton Regional, and why UConn is a No. 1 seed over Maryland.

    Story | Conversation | February 16, 2007
  8. Weak schedules for OU, Duke? Think again

    Charlie Creme

    Pitt as a No. 1 seed? The notion that highly ranked teams such as Duke and Oklahoma have weak schedules? Pretty ridiculous, Charlie Creme writes in this week's mailbag.

    Story | Conversation | December 15, 2006
  9. OU or OSU for the final No. 2 seed?

    Charlie Creme

    Forget debating whether OU or OSU gets the final No. 2 seed. As Charlie Creme explains, it doesn't really matter because their paths won't be much different. • Bracket

    Story | Conversation | March 01, 2006
  10. Remember, it's never about just what one team does

    Charlie Creme

    For Maryland to get a No. 1 seed, the Terps must keep winning -- and watch OU and the SEC. • Monday chat, 2 ET • Bracket

    Story | Conversation | February 23, 2006
  11. History has a lot to teach us

    Charlie Creme

    Why are Indiana State and Hartford seeded so low? Bracket guru Charlie Creme has the answers. • Bracket | More

    Story | Conversation | February 15, 2006
  12. Yes, Tennessee is now a No. 2 seed

    Charlie Creme

    Charlie Creme says LSU would now be a No. 1 seed -- and defends his bracket in this week's mailbag.

    Story | Conversation | January 29, 2006
  13. Profiles looking up for Ducks, 'Horns

    Charlie Creme

    Bracketologist Charlie Creme defends his seeds for Texas and Stanford, and a decision to omit Oregon.

    Story | Conversation | February 22, 2005
  14. Pre-determined ponderings

    Charlie Creme

    Pre-determined sites are preferred, but not perfect says our resident bracketologist.

    Story | Conversation | February 17, 2003